Regulatory gaps in the protection of the human rights of female live streaming hosts in platform-based employment relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54957/jolas.v6i2.2222Keywords:
Digital Economy, Legal Protection, Live Streaming Hosts, Socio-Legal Studies, Social RightsAbstract
The rapid growth of the digital economy has generated new forms of platform-based employment, including the profession of live streaming hosts. This occupation has become increasingly popular among women due to its flexibility and accessibility as a source of income. However, the expansion of digital labor has not been accompanied by an adequate regulatory framework capable of ensuring the protection of workers' human rights, particularly those of women. This study aims to analyze the regulatory gap in the protection of women's human rights as live streaming hosts through a sociology of law perspective. The research employs an empirical legal method with a qualitative approach. Primary data were collected through semi-structured interviews with female live streaming hosts, while secondary data were obtained from laws and regulations, academic literature, and relevant supporting documents. The findings reveal significant regulatory gap s that hinder the fulfillment of fundamental labor rights, including access to social security, health protection, job security, and protection from digital violence and harassment. Furthermore, oversight mechanisms for digital platforms remain limited, resulting in an imbalance of bargaining power that places female workers in a vulnerable position. These findings demonstrate a discrepancy between law in books and law in action, which contributes to the structural exclusion of women within the digital economy. Therefore, regulatory reform and stronger policy measures grounded in a human rights approach are necessary to ensure fair, safe, and equitable working conditions for women in the evolving digital labor ecosystem.
References
Cotterrell, R. (1992). The sociology of law: An introduction (2nd ed.). Butterworths.
De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the “just-in-time workforce”: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labour protection in the gig economy. International Labour Office.
Fu, J., Huang, S., & Chen, X. (2024). The impact of non-stereotypical gender role endorsement in live broadcasting on consumers' purchase intention. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1359952. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1359952
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
Google, Temasek, & Bain & Company. (2024). e-Conomy SEA 2024.
Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan.
Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2004 tentang Sistem Jaminan Sosial Nasional.
Indonesia. (2011). Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2011 tentang Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial.
International Labour Organization. (2021). World Employment and Social Outlook 2021: The role of digital labour platforms in transforming the world of work. International Labour Office.
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174
MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press.
Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class and other essays. Cambridge University Press.
Prassl, J. (2018). Humans as a service: The promise and perils of work in the gig economy. Oxford University Press.
Rouvroy, A., & Berns, T. (2013). Algorithmic governmentality and prospects of emancipation: Disparateness as a precondition for individuation through relationships? Réseaux, 177(1), 163–196. https://doi.org/10.3917/res.177.0163
Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.
van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fransiska Triwidya Purba

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








